UK Supreme Court halts Rwanda refugee plan


The UK Supreme Court has shot down the government’s plan for certain asylum-seekers to be processed in Rwanda, labelling it “unlawful”.

We’ve read all 56 pages of the court’s decision so you don’t have to. The legalese gets complex in parts but, intriguingly, the judges delve into some of Rwanda’s recent history, including:

  • Rwanda’s “apparent failure” to uphold an earlier migration deal with Israel, and
  • at least 100 allegations of refoulement and threatened refoulement” (ie, forcibly returning people to a country where they’re at risk).

But the court says ultimately the issue isn’t “the good faith of the government of Rwanda at the political level, but its practical ability to fulfil its assurances.”

Domestically, the court’s decision caps an eventful few days for Downing Street (includinga shock cabinet reshuffle), and comes just as Prime Minister Sunak suits up for next year’s elections.

But regionally, the UK isn’t exactly an outlier. Irregular crossings through the Central Mediterranean have almost doubled this year, and more capitals are looking to third-country deals for an answer:

  • Italy recently announced it would build two migrant centres in Albania
  • Germany is examining the feasibility of its own Rwanda-style deal, and 
  • The EU and Tunisia are still working on their agreement from June.

And European supporters of this third-country approach have, in turn, long taken their inspiration from the other side of the world: Australia.

INTRIGUE’S TAKE

It’s hard to think of a more sensitive topic than migration, sitting right at the crossroads of national identity, state sovereignty, individual dignity, and international responsibility.

In that maelstrom, Sunak says he’ll rework his plan in order to address the court’s concerns. But anyone who’s familiar with Australia’s system (the model for the Rwanda deal) knows this is probably just the beginning.

Also worth noting:

  • Sunak’s vow to introduce emergency legislation came shortly after his Australian counterpart pledged his own urgent laws in response to a separate landmark court case on migration.
Latest Author Articles
Five things we found out at this year’s BRICS summit

The yearly BRICS summit wrapped up in Russia yesterday (Thursday), ninja-starring dozens of new announcements out into the world before dropping a 32-page Joint Declaration that probably could’ve just been an email. But first, some context. Starting out as a Goldman Sachs acronym for emerging markets with promise back in 2001, the four originals (Brazil, Russia, India, […]

25 October, 2024
North Korea enters the Russo-Ukraine war

What are friends for, if not to help in times of need? We imagine that’s roughly what Vladimir Putin said when he asked Kim Jong Un for a few thousand North Korean soldiers to help his three-day invasion of Ukraine, which is now heading into its third year.  Anyway, North Korea’s supreme leader seems to […]

22 October, 2024
Big tech goes nuclear 

Google has announced it’s inked a deal with Kairos Power to buy small modular reactors (SMRs) to help power the tech giant’s investments in data centres and AI. Google says it chose SMRs due to, well, their small size and modular nature, which in turn can “reduce construction timelines, allow deployment in more places, and make the […]

17 October, 2024
Why did China just rehearse a Taiwan invasion again?

Folks in Taiwan exhaled overnight as China withdrew its forces after encircling the democratic and self-ruled island with mass military exercises. Here’s what happened. Early yesterday morning (Monday), Beijing launched a set of joint military drills involving troops from its army, navy, air force, and rocket force (yes, that’s a real thing). They were simulating an assault on […]

15 October, 2024